Loading reviews…
Not true, too simplistic
The training felt confused between the skill of making persuasive arguments, and self-critical thinking in search of truth. One thing it got muddled is that evidence does not need to be in any way true, it just needs to be believed or convincing to the other opposition. This is an important distinction as this is where a lot of skill in arguing comes – in tailoring your argument to the audience's own beliefs to bring them from theirs to yours. The truth does not always matter in convincing people of certain ideas (as we all know), and is something we should be acutely aware of. It felt far too simplistic to say evidence should be true when we all know how subjective and nuanced the truth can be.
Some good points
There were some good points but would be better with ways to put them into practice on a regular basis if you do not normally think this way.
Thank you for you give me your time
This user gave this course a rating of 5/5 stars
Useful way to think
Useful way to think about reasoning and getting your point across
super
the topic will he help us a lot on our daily work
Seems very similar to previous assement
This user gave this course a rating of 3/5 stars
Good practical advice
Makes you think logically for preparing a constructive argument, such as requesting a pay rise or some other work issue you wish to challenge.
Good thought provoking exercise
This user gave this course a rating of 5/5 stars
Opening up mindset
I enjoy this kind of training as you can refresh
Any jobs for me on your site?
I can see myself as a presenter. Psychology does interest me but I gained very little from this course.