Environmental Awareness Training Reviews

Not appropriate in a corporate environment. Too politically/ideologically aligned and not respectful of individual viewpoints. Treats contested views as factual statements and activism based. Would not recommend this module and have responded with expected answers rather than actual facts to complete course.

The course is great in reminding us all of the small changes that we can make better environmental decisions.

This user gave this course a rating of 5/5 stars

This user gave this course a rating of 5/5 stars

This user gave this course a rating of 2/5 stars

Slide Qualifying statements 7:30 Methane statement. Use of images showing livestock and blaming same for methane emissions when in fact, “Methane comes from both natural sources and human activities. An estimated 60% of today’s methane emissions are the result of human activities. The largest sources of methane are agriculture, fossil fuels, and decomposition of landfill waste. Natural processes account for 40% of methane emissions, with wetlands being the largest natural source.” https://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/methane/#:~:text=Methane%20comes%20from%20both%20natural,and%20decomposition%20of%20landfill%20waste. 7:30 Statement on irrigation, misleading, figures for worldwide usage quoted,, not OECD. https://www.oecd.org/agriculture/topics/water-and-agriculture/ 8:30 The statement made in the video, where it is claimed that an individual throws away their own body weight in waste every 7 weeks is unqualified. The source I found (there wer

This user gave this course a rating of 5/5 stars