Loading reviews…
great easy to follow course
A really great course which is easy to follow and includes cyber security. It's also short which is a plus. The test at the end was straight forward.
The course was contradictory in nature.
The course was contradictory. It started by highlighting that the most damaging cases of fraud of those committed by staff in the most senior and powerful positions, and also used Nick Leeson as an example. Yet every other example was a case of small scale individual fraud committed by junior staff. The course highlighted that the most damaging fraud cases are committed by multiple people, and every example was then a single individual. The course should either by focused on small scale, easily repeatable fraud that most people would be in a position to be able to spot, or on large scale, multiple people fraud that, as in the case of Bearings or Enron, could lead to the bankruptcy of the company.
Easy to understand
Good course. Interactive. Easy to understand. Interesting case studies
Fantastic
Enlightening and well put together
Simple and effective
This user gave this course a rating of 5/5 stars
Good awareness course
Good course in highlighting actions which some staff might not realise is classified as fraud.
Course was very helpul
I found this course both interesting and helpful in learning a lot about fraud.
More useful than expected
I found this video much more useful than I had expected. I expected it to be based on large firms but was equally applicable in a school.
The first question
Slide 2.1 Detection/ Discovering Fraud states that 40% of fraud is discovered by tip off. My first question Stated that the majority of fraud was discovered by tip off–True or False. 40% is not a majority so I said false and was marked wrong. I don't see why. 53% of tip offs were by staff but that was not the question. Am I missing something?
good
it was good