Loading reviews…
What a waste of time
Clashing concepts and vague.
The course is good
The course made me more aware of what is or isn't Sexual Harassment in the work place.
Easy to Follow
Easy to follow course. Highlighted a lots of issues that you may not be aware of around you. How to cope with these issues if its you of someone else and the correct policy and procedures to follow
Simples!
Easy to understand commonsense information.
Clear and concise
Good length, clear course
I have a better understanding
A course worth doing
Short and to the point. It makes you think.
This user gave this course a rating of 5/5 stars
Good but then i had to look up further info online for completeness
Good overall, but a couple of areas could be up for contention. For example in the "Emma and Dominic" scenario, Whilst the narrator said they were comfortable to flirt and hug in the workplace, hence no Sexual harrassment had occurred – according to the rest of the presentation, an observer could have been offended by this and therefore Emma and Dominic could be construed as being guilty of unintentional Sexual harrassment – therefore Sexual harrassment was "commited". Similarly with the "Nick and Stacey" scenario. This is an area for concern as it shows there are no limits to the boundaries that can be construed as Sexual harrassment and therefore, dealing with such scenarios as a manager could be extremely difficult. Additionally, i think this course demonstrates that the "victim" is always right and the "harrasser" is immediately deemed to be in the wrong – based purely on the "victims" complaint. This can then lead to people being too wary to engage in what they consider (and 99% of the workforce do also) normal conversation or interaction with a colleague, in case it is misconstued as a case for Sexual harrassment. The course also does not really address such things as age and maturity/clumsiness/social awareness and the generational gaps. Still a good starting point presentation however.
Reasonable grounding in this topic
This was a good intro to the topic. I'm not sure I learned anything new but I expect some people will. The test was a bit too simplistic in my view.
Simple and straightforward to follow.
The course seemed to be a little fuzzy on certain areas. When is it clear that behaviour is welcomed or not welcomed? There is a lot of greyness in human interaction. Also certain scenarios where the advice is to ask the perpetrator to stop, like displaying a calander, how many times is enough; is twice enough, then you report them? I'm not saying that everything has to be perfectly precise, but there should be a bit more of an acknowledgment of dealing with the greyness around some of these areas.