Fraud Awareness and Prevention Training Reviews

This user gave this course a rating of 5/5 stars

Course Feedback Avoid subjective labels Terms like “irritable,” “defensive,” or “difficult to work with” risk bias and may indirectly relate to protected characteristics (e.g. disability, age, religion, sex). Lifestyle references are problematic Comments on “new house,” “jewellery,” “car beyond their means” can encourage intrusive, non-work-related monitoring and may be based on rumour. Monitoring must be necessary, proportionate, and lawful under UK data protection law. Reframe data copying risks Data exfiltration by leavers is valid but should be addressed as an information security issue, not a behavioural judgement. Follow ACFE and CIPFA guidance Focus on control failures and anomalies, not personality or lifestyle traits. The latter increases bias, false positives, and missed risks.

I think the authors of this training should be deeply ashamed of themselves. It's outrageous to suggest that we spy on and police our colleagues, especially those who are more vulnerable due to other life stresses. To suggest that I should care about corporations over individual human beings is truly unhinged.